18+ only·We may earn a commission from operators we list — how that worksAd disclosure·Free, confidential help: Help 0800 654 655
outofthewoods.co.nzIndependent NZ casino reviews

Independent since 2024

About outofthewoods.co.nz [September 2026]: Who We Are, How We Test, How We Are Paid

We are a small New Zealand editorial team that tests online casinos and sportsbooks the tedious way: real accounts, real deposits, real withdrawals, timed to the minute. This page explains who we are, how we work, how we are paid, and what we will not do.

46Operators tested
241Withdrawals timed
5Named editors
1,900+Hours of testing

outofthewoods.co.nz exists because most New Zealand casino comparison content is written by people who have never opened an account at the sites they recommend. Feeds get reprinted, bonus numbers get copied, payout claims get repeated, and payment methods that stopped working eighteen months ago stay on the page. We started this site to do the boring version properly.

The boring version means opening an account from an Auckland or Christchurch IP address, putting our own money through it, reading every clause of the bonus terms, timing the withdrawal with a stopwatch and asking the support desk something awkward at three in the morning. It takes about six hours per operator and we do it again every month.

What makes us different

Our approach against the industry norm
What most comparison sites doWhat we do
Quote the operator’s stated payout windowPublish a measured median with the sample size attached
Rank on headline bonus sizeRank on turnover required, game weighting, maximum bet and expiry
Quote lobby size from a press releaseAudit studio coverage against a fixed nine-studio list and sample RTP configurations
Show a licence badgePublish the licence number, the operating company, and say when there is neither
List POLi because the template doesRe-test every payment rail monthly and remove the ones that stopped working
Use house bylines or stock-photo personasName a writer and a separate fact-checker on every page, each with a profile
Recommend everything they are paid forList operators we would not use, ranked where their scores put them
Update the year in the titleRe-measure the underlying data monthly and log what changed
The POLi example is the clearest test. POLi has not been available as a casino deposit method in New Zealand for some time. It still appears on a large number of New Zealand casino comparison pages, including some very well-known ones, because those pages were built from a template and never re-checked. That single fact tells you most of what you need to know about how current a page is.

How we are funded

Revenue share. When a reader opens an account with an operator through a link on this site, that operator pays us a percentage of its net revenue from that account. There is no display advertising, no subscription and no paid placement.

We think that model is defensible provided two things are true: that it is disclosed plainly, and that it demonstrably does not set the rankings. On the first, there is a disclosure at the top of every page that carries a commercial link. On the second, here is the evidence:

  • Our highest-paying partner pays 50% and ranks fourth on the homepage.
  • Our top-ranked casino pays 45%.
  • We list operators paying 20% and 25% alongside those paying 45–50%.
  • We list an operator we explicitly advise readers to be cautious about, at position sixteen, with the reasons stated.

If commission set the order, none of that would be the case. The methodology page sets out the full set of controls, and we will tell you the commission rate for any specific operator if you email and ask.

What we will not do

What we commit to

  • Test every operator from a New Zealand IP with our own money
  • Publish the scoring weights and every component score
  • Publish sample sizes beside every measured figure
  • Name a writer and a fact-checker on every page
  • List operators we would not personally use, with reasons
  • Correct errors quickly and log material corrections on the page

What we refuse

  • Accept payment for placement or for a higher position
  • Let an operator review a draft before publication
  • Remove a negative finding in exchange for commercial terms
  • Publish guest posts, sponsored content or paid links
  • Describe gambling as a way to make money or solve a financial problem
  • Reprint an operator’s claim as though we had verified it

Our record

Founded2024
Operators tested46
Operators listed19
Withdrawals timed241
Hours of testing1,900+
Editors5
Pages fact-checkedEvery one
Review cycleMonthly

Corrections policy

We publish numbers, and numbers go stale or turn out to be wrong. When that happens we want to fix it quickly and visibly.

  • Email [email protected] with the URL and the problem.
  • We aim to acknowledge within two working days and correct within five.
  • Material corrections — anything that would change a reader’s decision — are noted on the page itself, not silently edited.
  • Every page carries the date it was last updated and the date of its next scheduled review. If the next review date has passed, treat the figures with caution and tell us.

Contact

Editorial and corrections: [email protected]. Operator complaints: [email protected]. Privacy: [email protected]. General: [email protected]. Post: PO Box 106-172, Auckland 1143, New Zealand. Full detail on our contact page.

About us — frequently asked questions

Who owns outofthewoods.co.nz?

outofthewoods.co.nz is published by Casino Edge Media Limited, a New Zealand registered company (NZBN 9429050000000). It is independently owned and is not part of an operator group, a casino network or an operator-owned media business. No gambling operator holds any equity in the company.

How do you make money?

Revenue share from operators when a reader opens an account through one of our links. There is no display advertising and no paid placement. The commercial arrangement is disclosed at the top of every page that contains such a link, and our methodology page sets out the controls that keep it away from the rankings.

Are your reviewers real people?

Yes. Five named editors, each with a declared beat, a published biography and a profile page: our authors. Every content page names the writer and a separate fact-checker. We do not publish under house bylines or invented personas.

Do you accept guest posts or paid links?

No. We do not accept guest contributions, sponsored posts, paid links or link insertions, and we do not respond to outreach offering them. Every page on this site is written by a named member of the editorial team.

Can an operator pay to be listed or removed?

No to both. Listing follows from testing and scoring. An operator that meets the standard is listed at the position its score produces; one that fails a disqualifying test is not listed at any price. We have declined both kinds of request.

How can I contact the editorial team?

Email [email protected] for anything editorial, including corrections. Use [email protected] for operator complaints and our contact page for everything else.

Start with the rankings

Nineteen operators tested, scored and explained, with the component marks published.

Best online casinos NZHow we review